Outcomes and predictors of recurrences after pulmonary vein isolation by cryoballoon or radiofrequency catheter atrial fibrillation ablation

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published Oct 1, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22551/2017.16.0403.10106
Mihaela Grecu Mariana Floria Elisabeta Hurjui Dana Mindru Raluca Ozana Chistol Catalina Arsenescu Georgescu Grigore Tinica

Abstract

Aim: Catheter-based pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) has become a new option treatment for drug-resistant and symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). We aimed to assess the outcomes after radiofrequency and cryoballoon catheter AF ablation. Material and methods: We performed a single-center prospective clinical study enrolling patients who underwent catheter ablation for paroxysmal AF between 2013 and 2015. The main objective was the outcomes after AF ablation by cryoballoon or radiofrequency energy. Follow-up was performed at 3, 6 and 12 months after ablation. Results: A total of 85 patients were included: 64 assigned to radiofrequency and 21 to cryoballoon ablation. Overall success rate at 3, 6 and 12 months post-ablation was 62%, 76% and 75%, respectively. Redo procedure was required in 8 patients (10.3%) at 6 months. Success rate at 12 months was non-significantly higher in radiofrequency ablation group (76% versus 62%; p=0.56). Complication rates were equivalent, without life treating or permanent sequels. Men gender, AF duration, obesity and sleep apnoea syndrome were clinical predictors of AF recurrence at 12 months after procedure. Conclusions: Cryoballoon and radiofrequency ablation appear to be safe and effective procedures for AF treatment, with similar success rate. Men gender, AF duration, obesity and sleep apnea syndrome seem to be associated with AF recurrence after ablation.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

atrial fibrillation, catheter ablation, cryoballoon, radiofrequency, pulmonary vein isolation

References
1. 2012 HRS/EHRA/ECAS Expert Consensus Statement on Catheter and Surgical Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: Recommendations for Patient Selection, Procedural Techniques, Patient Management and Follow-up, Definitions, Endpoints, and Research Trial Design: A report of the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) Task Force on Catheter and Surgical Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation. Europace 2012; 14:528-606.
2. Kirchhof P, Benussi S, Kotecha D, et al. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS. Eur Heart J 2016; 37(38):2893-2962.
3. Kuck KH, Brugada J, Fürnkranz A, et al. Cryoballoon or radiofrequency ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2016; 374:2235–2245.
4. Luik A, Radzewitz A, Kieser M, et al. Cryoballoon versus open irrigated radiofrequency ablation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: the prospective, randomized, controlled, noninferiority Freeze AF Study. Circulation 2015; 132:1311-1319.
5. Wasserlauf J, Pelchovitz DJ, Rhyner J, et al. Cryoballoon versus radiofrequency catheter ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2015; 38:83-89.
6. Jourda F, Providencia R, Marijon E, et al. Contact-force guided radiofrequency vs. second-generation balloon cryotherapy for pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation-a prospective evaluation. Europace 2015; 17:225-231.
7. Squara F, Zhao A, Marijon E, et al. Comparison between radiofrequency with contact force-sensing and second-generation cryoballoon for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation catheter ablation: a multicenter European evaluation. Europace 2015; 17:718-724.
8. Aryana A, Singh SM, Kowalski M, et al. Acute and long-term outcomes of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation using the second-generation cryoballoon versus open irrigated radiofrequency: a multicenter experience. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2015; 26:832-839.
9. Hunter RJ, Baker V, Finlay MC, et al. Point-by-point radiofrequency ablation versus the cryoballoon or a novel combined approach: a randomized trial comparing 3 methods of pulmonary vein isolation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (the Cryo Versus RF Trial). J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2015; 26:1307-1314.
10. Straube F, Dorwarth U, Ammar-Busch S, et al. First-line catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: outcome of radiofrequency vs. cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation. Europace 2016; 18(3):368-375.
11. Packer DL, Kowal RC, Wheelan KR, et al. Cryoballoon ablation of pulmonary veins for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: first results of the North American Arctic Front (STOP AF) pivotal trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013; 61:1713-1723.
12. Liu XH, Chen CF, Gao XF, Xu YZ. Safety and efficacy of different catheter ablations for atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2016; 39(8):883-899.
13. Kuppahally SS, Akoum N, Burgon NS, et al. Left atrial strain and strain rate in patients with paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation: relationship to left atrial structural remodeling detected by delayed-enhancement MRI. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2010; 3:231–239.
14. Hsieh MH, Tai CT, Tsai CF, et al. Clinical outcome of very late recurrence of atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2003; 14(6):598–601.
15. Mainigi SK, Sauer WH, Cooper JM, et al. Incidence and predictors of very late recurrence of atrial fibrillation after ablation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2007; 18(1):69–74.
16. Weerasooriya R, Khairy P, Litalien J, et al. Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: are results maintained at 5 years of follow-up? J Am Coll Cardiol 2011; 57(2):160–166.
17. Pathak RK, Middeldorp ME, Lau DH, et al. Aggressive risk factor reduction study for atrial fibrillation and implications for the outcome of ablation: the ARREST-AF cohort study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014; 64(21):2222-2231.
18. Parkash R, Wells GA, Sapp JL, et al. Effect of aggressive blood pressure control on the recurrence of atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation: a randomized, open-label clinical trial (SMAC-AF [substrate modification with aggressive blood pressure control]). Circulation 2017; 135(19):1788-1798.
How to Cite
Grecu, M., Floria, M., Hurjui, E., Mindru, D., Chistol, R. O., Arsenescu Georgescu, C., & Tinica, G. (2017). Outcomes and predictors of recurrences after pulmonary vein isolation by cryoballoon or radiofrequency catheter atrial fibrillation ablation. Archive of Clinical Cases, 4(3), Arch Clin Cases 2017; 4(3):139-145. https://doi.org/10.22551/2017.16.0403.10106
Issue
Vol. 4 No. 3 (2017)
Section
Original studies

Archive of Clinical Cases is protected by copyright and may be used in accordance with copyright and other applicable laws. Content available at www.clinicalcases.eu and our digital applications is intended for personal noncommercial use.

Authors who submit a manuscript for publication in Archive of Clinical Cases agree to the following terms: a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal. c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) only after the final version of the manuscript was accepted and published, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access). d. It is compulsory that before submission authors ensure that their work was not published in any other medical journals or pending acceptance for publication and that "Archives of Clinical Cases" is the only beneficiary at that moment if their work/case will be accepted by us.

Guidelines for linking to www.clinicalcases.eu a. The main purpose of the site linking to the Archive of Clinical Casess site should be educational. b. Links should be made to the Archive of Clinical Casess home page (www.clinicalcases.eu) or to the articles abstract. c. It is forbidden to use the Archive of Clinical Casess cover by outside organizations unless permission has been granted in advance, notifying our Secretary. d. Material owned by the Archive of Clinical Cases (including the name, logo, cover, and text) may not be used in any manner that may induce the idea or suggest that the Archive of Clinical Cases is in some way recommending a specific company, product or service. e. You must not use or allow others to access or use, all or any part of our Site or the contents and/or applications on it for commercial purposes without our permission. To seek permission to do anything prohibited by or not contained in these TERMS, or which requires our prior consent or agreement, you can contact us.

How to Cite

Grecu, M., Floria, M., Hurjui, E., Mindru, D., Chistol, R. O., Arsenescu Georgescu, C., & Tinica, G. (2017). Outcomes and predictors of recurrences after pulmonary vein isolation by cryoballoon or radiofrequency catheter atrial fibrillation ablation. Archive of Clinical Cases, 4(3), Arch Clin Cases 2017; 4(3):139-145. https://doi.org/10.22551/2017.16.0403.10106